In Matière SAS v. ABM Precast Solutions Ltd,[1] the High Court held that a Part 36 offer made by the claimant represented a genuine offer to settle the claim but effectively offered nothing in respect ...

The decision highlights a potential tactical advantage of late acceptance in certain circumstances. In Roxanne Pallett v. MGN Limited,[1] the High Court held that the usual costs consequences of ...

PPR had made a Part 36 offer of $8,052,276.57, with the relevant period expiring on 8 May 2025. The court found that PPR comfortably beat that offer: assessed as at that date, the principal sum plus ...

Late acceptance of a Part 36 offer in an ex-Protocol claim does not entitle a claimant to standard basis costs, even where the case has since been allocated to the multi-track. The Court of Appeal has ...